You say some editors have encouraged the reporting of effect sizes. Which ones?

-         Campion (1993) in Personnel Psychology

-         Combs (2010) in the Academy of Management Journal

-         Iacobucci (2005) in the Journal of Consumer Research

-         Kendall (1997) and La Greca (2005) both in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

-         Lustig and Strauser (2004) in the Journal of Rehabilitation

-         Murphy (1997) and Zedeck (2003) both in the Journal of Applied Psychology

-         Shaver (2006) in the Journal of International Business Studies

As usual in matters of statistical reform, psychology journals lead the way. In a recent poll of psychology editors Cumming et al. (2007) found that a majority now advocate effect size reporting.

On his website Bruce Thompson lists 24 educational and psychology journals that now require effect size reporting.

A full list of references can be found here.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.