What’s wrong with the traditional narrative review of the literature?

What’s right with it?!

Most of us take a qualitative approach to reviewing the literature for no reason other than that’s what we were taught to do or what we’ve read. But there are at least four problems with narrative reviews:

  1. they are rarely comprehensive
  2. they are highly susceptible to reviewer bias
  3. they seldom take into account differences in the quality of studies
  4. they often come to the wrong conclusion or no conclusion at all, hence the oft-heard call for further research

On each count meta-analysis offers a superior alternative.

For more, see The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.